Volker wrote:
There are two possibilities. The first is to add a parameter recursive to the setNodeActivation method
Wait, isn't that bad? It doesn't make sense to be able to hide a node but still have parts of it (i.e. the child nodes) visible.
Quote:
the second is to create a group node where the model is attached in parallel to the emitters. This way you can disable the node and not the emitters while changing the transformation of the model and the emitters by using the group node
That's what I would suggest.